Blogs
Links
|
[Fri, 01 Oct 2004]
But what about self-service and quasi-self-service places? For example, should you tip at buffets, especially the Indian lunch buffets? I know of quite a few people who think it is not needed at all. After all, all that the waiter does is bring you water and clear up the plates. Heck! that is what he's being paid for. However, I've almost always left a measly tip- essentially the credit-card equivalent of leaving the coins behind. More guilt-assuaging than anything else. What about other self-service places? There's places like McDonalds that are trying to develop a tipping culture. That's just wrong- there's zero service involved. Sometimes such places will try to guilt you by writing "For the Childeren's Fund" or something like that. In other places, the penny jar is devolving into a tip jar. The penny jar was originally meant to be a take-a-penny/leave-a-penny jar. If I owe $5.27, and I only have a fiver and a quarter, I can't just take 2 pennies from the jar. No sirrrree.. I have to hand in a $20 and will drop the 3 pennies in the jar. Have never seen the take-a-penny thing working. What about Starbucks? This one hits a raw nerve because the coffee (and cookies etc.) is obscenely overpriced as it is. The moral case is also weak because Starbucks is known to be a good employer. Still the employee point of view-- that the more hairy orders require special effort (and hence tips!)-- can't be ignored. Still, as this fiesty and rather vehment "no" on the customers parts indicates, I don't think you need to worry about tipping at Starbucks anytime soon. And don't tip at McDonalds or Burger King or Pizza Hut (unless it's delivery) either. You are just making it harder for the rest of us. [Wed, 22 Sep 2004]
India too has interesting laws. Until a few years ago, there was this law which stated that every district headquarter must have two earthen pots filled with clean water for drinking. Turns out that the law did make sense when it was written- in the 1800s. Am not sure if this one is still on the books. [Wed, 08 Sep 2004]
A related and interesting observation is about the similarities between the religions that share a common "holy" city. All the Jerusalem religions are monotheistic in a very unambiguous way; there really is no one else but *the* God and unless you accept him, you are damned to hell. These religions also have codified instructions for specific choices to be made in day-to-day living. "Don't work on Fridays" (Islam); "Don't work on Sundays" (Judaism) or; "Observe Lent" (Christianity). On the other hand, the Kashi religions, Hinduism and Buddhism, are rather evasive about the whole monotheistic-vs-polytheistic issue. Hindu mythology is expressly polytheistic. But it does have a subtle monotheistic slant as reflected in the notion of the divine Trinity being one meta-entity with mutually complementary gods: Brahma (Creator), Vishnu (Provider??), and Shiva (Destroyer). Hindu *philosophy* (as opposed to the *mythology*) increases the ambivalence, by distinguishing the notion of a "Nir-gun" [ethereal] God as opposed to the "Sa-gun" [anthropomorphic] god(s). Buddhism evades the notion of an overarching God altogether by focusing on the individual and the notion of a personal "nirvana". Unlike the Jerusalem religions, both Hinduism and Buddhism are non-prescriptive religions that, in their essence, do not tell you how to live. The fact that priests in both the religions have developed a rigid set of rules for daily living is another matter. Hindu mythology, in particular, is replete with cases of revered rishis and sadhus who'd be considered distinctly unholy by today's rigid standards. I think there are other differences as well. (Beware!! I am not a theologer!) Both the Kashi religions make it possible for the individual to reach the highest level of religious enlightenment simply by meditation and self-reflection, an option not available in any of the Jerusalem religions. In the latter, an expressed and repeated devotion to God is essential. The Kashi religions are very comfortable with the notion of reincarnations, while the Jerusalem religions are not. In one very interesting way all these 5 religions differ from the Far Eastern spiritual sects. A fundamental belief in the latter was the humans are essentially meant to be happy and not suffer. As long as they behave well to others, they'll lead happy lives in harmony with nature, which is pretty much the most you are supposed to want. In contrast, both the Jerusalem and Kashi religions take a rather dim view of human life-- a person can't be "saved" unless he/she makes specific efforts to redeem himself. And even then, more often than not, the "saving" counts only when you are dead. A corollary of this seems to be that monks are common in these religions whereas original Confucianism/Taoism didn't have followers who gave up all worldly duties/tasks and just devoted themselves to the service of God or the search of enlightenment. Indeed, this was the basis of an argument, about 1400yrs ago, that the Taoists used to fight the spread of Buddhism: "Indians are basically evil and hence Buddhism is suited for their redemption. Chinese are basically good and hence it is not suited for us." Nice... I am sure people have explored these parallels before. It'd be interesting to see what they came up with. To repeat, I am not a theologer/theologist/whatever!! [Sat, 17 Jul 2004]
[Thu, 15 Jul 2004]
The milk powder reminds me-- I haven't seen the equivalent of MilkMaid here. Ingredients
500 gms. carrot peeled, grated Method
Mix carrot and milk in a deep microwaveproof bowl.
Making time: 30 minutes
[Tue, 13 Jul 2004]
Ditto for driving- lanes that seem so wide when you are standing on ground seem impossibly narrow when you are driving. So it turns that this is not just a figment of my imagination. There is this notion of the peripersonal space (NYT) that extends to about an arm's length from our body, or if we have a tool, till the tool's reach. Our brains seem to be especially attentive to things happening in this space.
Still, seven gold medals...If he were Indian, he'd increase India's medals tally by a gazillion percent. Seriously, of all the major-sized nations, we must be the ones with the most pathetic olympic record. Blame Tendulkar :-) [Sun, 11 Jul 2004]
[Fri, 09 Jul 2004]
Seriously, even getting coffee in my office is now an elaborate exercise in decision making. Stata has numerous coffee sources. Many of these I have access to, especially when no one's watching. The old, "put-on-a-pot" coffee-maker is about antediluvian as my family's first TV which had a knob for selecting one of 8 channels. You can use the funky mini-espresso maker in the W3C wing on my floor. That coffee is good only with milk and sugar. If you want good black coffee, the place to go is the 8-th floor where they have another funky coffee maker. This one takes small prepackaged boxes with just enough ground coffee for one serving. Pick the flavor you want, pop the box in and, presto!, the machine will brea fresh coffee for you. This one's coffee is quite aromatic. The cheaper cousins of this are the flasks on the 6th floor which the gnomes fill with really nice coffee. The coffee they use is nice, but isn't always fresh. Finally, on the topmost floor sits the grand-daddy of all coffee-makers. It's a full-blown espresso maker, complete with a shiny insert-and-twist-thingie and a shot glass. Took me about 30 min to get it to work the first time around. Even its froth-maker works. And of course, there's StarBucks. Since the closest one is too far (about 400 yards), they are opening a new one in Stata's ground floor in Fall. I forgot to mention the gazillion varieties of tea (regular and herbal) available for your drinking pleasure in the pantry. [Sun, 13 Jun 2004]
I always liked Python more than Perl. The conversion is now complete. The only Perl code I now write are one-liners. Python can't be used to write one-liners but its verbosity and forced indentation and intuitive function names make it easy to read. And the final time to write the program isn't that much anyway. Now that I've gotten used to its modules, its gotten easier for me to write scripts that do lots of pipes and program-running business. These days, during the course of work, a hairy command line will typically pull in many different languages: cat test3_${j}_${i%.policy}.ct | perl -ne '{chomp; print "echo ",$_," | addZero | chainbuild --param '${j}.prm' --fixomega --pdb > test3_decoy_'${j}_${i%.policy}'_",$.,".gly \n ./nbEasy test3_decoy_'${j}_${i%.policy}'_",$.,".gly | grep neighbouring \n"; }' > test3_${j}_${i%.policy}.1 ls ${j}/test3_runs/$i| GetStructParamsAll.py | tail -1 | perl -pe 's/\s+/\n/g;' | sed '1 d'| perl -ne '{chomp; if ($.%3==2) {print;} if ($.%3==0) {print " ", $_, "\n";}}'| perl -ne '{ if (/\S+\s+\S+/) {print;}}' > ${j}/test4_runs/${i%.gly}.tors chainbuild is a C++ program, with 3rd-party Fortran libraries. I use awk/sed usually, and call in Perl's regexes if awk would get too unwieldy. Perl's -pe/-ne flags are really handy. Shell scripting is useful for running simulations and any script that is permanent enough to go into a file is almost always Python. Sometimes I wonder if I go overboard with this scripting business. But, then again, its pretty useful. [Mon, 07 Jun 2004]
Anyways, all visitors to her (my sis-in-law's) home speculate on the motivation behind that painting. One theory that my brother likes to offer, tongue firmly in cheek, is that its much harder to paint exactly straight lines than to paint landscapes and hence the painting offered more of a challenge than the landscapes that my sis-in-law usually paints. Now I've figured out the origins of that painting. The origins of that *style* of painting, that is. So it turns out there was this Dutch guy, Piet Mondrian, whose theory about painting went something like this: all of painting is basically about drawing and coloring. As per his style/philosophy ("Neoplasticism"), the basic drawing element is the straight line and the basic "primordial" colors are red, yellow and blue. Combine the two. Of course, if you make pretty pictures and people like them enough to ask you why you made them, you have all the leeway in the world to propound on the "philosophy" behind Neoplasticism. See this page for a voluminous discussion and some links. There is a lot of bullshit about mysticism and spirituality and the infinite nature of vertical/horizontal line. Also, Harvard's Art Museum is having a retrospective of some sort and they too have some pretty pictures. Mondrian went further actually. His weirdest stuff, IMHO, was a painting made by crisscrossed colored adhesive tape. Line + Color = Colored Lines = Essence of Painting. One such painting is titled the Broadway Boogie Woogie. This is "normal" Neoplasticism: This is "experimental" Neoplasticism: This is Synthesis aka adhesive tape selling for a BIG money: This is the tangent I shot off from Who said you can't get your education from comics! [Tue, 18 May 2004]
"I've come to realize that the looseness of the journalistic life, the seeming laxity of the newsroom, is an illusion. Yes, there's informality and there's humor, but beneath the surface lies something deadly serious. It is a code. Sometimes the code is not even written down, but it is deeply believed in. And, when violated, it is enforced with tribal ferocity." ... "All across America, there are offices that resemble newsrooms, and in those offices there are people who resemble journalists, but they are not engaged in journalism. What they do is not journalism because it does not regard the reader or, in the case of broadcasting, the listener or the viewer as a master to be served." "In this realm of pseudo-journalism, the audience is regarded as something to be manipulated. And when the audience is misled, no one in the pseudo-newsroom ever offers a peep of protest." .... "We live in changed times. Never has falsehood in America had such a large megaphone." He was talking about Fox News- who else! On a related note, here is an anguished article bemoaning The Times of India's fall in standards. TOI, atleast the web edition, really really sucks these days. [Wed, 12 May 2004]
Personally, I think IIT Kanpur and IIT Bombay produce the most well-rounded people- haven't had the chance to hang out with too many IIT Delhi guys. Academically, I've found amazingly smart people from each IIT (not counting some new "IITs") so that one is hard to judge. I wish India Today (and others) would recognize that IITs really are the best colleges in India- not just the best *engineering/professional* colleges. After all, few colleges require everbody to take 3 courses in pure sciences, 3 courses in math, 1 course in programming and atleast 4 courses in humanities (many people take more). And the rest of curriculum has enough electives for you to explore what you want. Thus I got a chance to fiddle with a few physics courses before I was convinced that string-theory really did make my head hurt. On a related note, IITK's director Prof Dhande is visiting Boston- general alumni relations and faculty hiring trip, it seems. He taught us two courses- engineering drawing (TA101- the scourge of half the student-body) and computer graphics. In TA101, there was this moment when a particularly painful student, in a lecture-room filled with 150-odd students, was belaboring a minor point. Prof Dhande's reply was classic: "yeah, you are right but that doesn't mean I am going to marry off my daughter to you" [Fri, 07 May 2004]
So the main character in most stories is Ben Bitdiddle. Its probably stupid to ascribe specific levels of intelligence to various characters but I think I have seen a pattern. Have blog, will speculate. As for Ben- well, he has lots of initiative. He's always willing to try new things viz. designing new chips and writing weird programs. He oftens starts companies to market these ideas. Ben, however, is rather unimaginative. His attempts are invariably bogged down in some techinal problems and his attempts at solving them are rather naive and can almost always be improved. Enter Alyssa P Hacker. Alyssa, the uber-hacker, is the one who'll tell Ben that there is a better way of doing things. At this point, the problem set usually turns towards you and asks you to help Ben do what Alyssa says can be done. Alyssa is kinda zen-like in that sense. There are some other characters that show up often. Louis Reasoner is typically a partner in crime with Ben, helping him design new chips and write weird programs and start companies. I can't make up my mind about how smart Louis is meant to be. But the feeling I get is that she's Ben's lackey and a rather dim one at that. (hint: "Alyssa says this can be done in .... Show Ben and Louis how this can be done. Louis is not too bright, so remember to comment your code"). Another major character is Cy D Fect. As the name suggests, Cy is typically involved when his design/program has unintended consequences. Then there's Lem E Tweakit who's forever making half-baked optimizations to Ben's stuff. There are a couple of other PHB types: Oliver Warbucks and DeWitt Aull etc. but I have only heard of them. So what prompted this long speculation? I sighted "our genomic hero: Ben Basepair" in the final test of my Comp Functional Genomics class. Not a bad name, waise. [Mon, 26 Apr 2004]
Lots of funny stories about the building are already becoming part of the lore. Will write about them later. Here's one: Richard Stallman (of GNU and Free Software Foundation fame) has an office in Gates Tower. He prefers if we called it Minas Morgul. Forgot to link in this article from the Boston Globe. [Fri, 23 Apr 2004]
"Our man in the street could try asking an auto mechanic to tell him ab out automobiles, then asking a programmer to tell him ab out programs, and comparing the results. The mechanic might reply as follows. "An automobile is constructed by people. After they have finished constructing it, it runs. However, it may have some bugs. [Most mechanics would use the term "problems", but everyone understands this one when he sp eaks of `bugs'.] These are usually minor [such as non-functioning windshield wip ers], but occasionally they are serious enough to make the automobile stop running. The bugs are found by testing, and are fixed. The automobile then runs prop erly, and is sold to the user. The user then op erates the automobile. However, as he uses it, new bugs may app ear. Therefore, the automobile must b e maintained. Maintenance is also required if the user wants to modify the automobile--for example, to improve its performance [perhaps by `souping up' the engine]. When the automobile becomes to difficult to maintain, the user has to buy a new one." Unfortunately, the programmer might say almost exactly the same things ab out programs! Our poor man in the street would be no further towards his goal. The reader has undoubtedly guessed by now that I am not interested in explaining the difference between a program and an automobile to the man in the street. He was just a pedagogical device, and will now be returned to his street. My purpose is to explain the difference between a program and an automobile to programmers. An automobile runs, a program does not. (Computers run, but I'm not discussing them.) An automobile requires maintenance, a program does not. A program does not need to have its stack cleaned every 10,000 miles. Its if statements do not wear out through use. (Previously undetected errors may need to be corrected, or it might be necessary to write a new but similar program, but those are different matters.) An automobile is a piece of machinery, a program is some kind of mathematical expression. Programmers may be disheartened to learn that their programs are not like automobiles, but are mathematical expressions. Automobiles can be loveable--one can relate to them almost as if they were alive. Mathematical expressions are not loveable--they are hard to relate to. Many programmers may feel like clinging to their b elief that programs are like automobiles. However, further thought reveals that mathematical expressions do have certain advantages over automobiles. Unlike an automobile, a mathematical expression can have a meaning. We can therefore ask whether it has the correct meaning. One cannot talk about the correctness of an automobile--it may run properly, but it makes no sense to say that it is correct. Since a program is a mathematical expression, one can (at least in principle) decide if it is correct." Of course, all the usual disclaimers about copyright still apply. [Thu, 22 Apr 2004]
"At the most selective private universities across the country, more fathers of freshmen are doctors than are hourly workers, teachers, clergy members, farmers or members of the military combined." Wow! Having lived in Stanford and MIT campuses (and near UCSD campus) I can personally vouch for how rich the general undergrad population seems to be. BMWs were far too common in the undergrad parking lots at Stanford. Uber-cool (and pricey!) gizmos are far too common at MIT (less space for cars here ;-). The reason for this development seems to be that *everybody* is much more desperate to get their kids into good colleges. Richer parents can, however, spend a lot\ more on college-prep, building up an impressive app packet for their kids. And it shows- almost all colleges say that applications have been getting better and better. Some of the undergrad application resumes are just mindblowing. Of course, they are also padded- there just can't be so many multi-tasking socially-conscious polymath prodigies around. And the whole early-decision stuff favours people who don't need fin aid i.e. the rich kids. There was one more reason why this article struck a chord. Charles Vest, one of MIT's longest serving presidents, is retiring. His eloquent farewell letter mentions a DOJ-initiated lawsuit regarding financial aid in the early 90s. At that time, top univs used to compare notes to best disburse financial aid in the most beneficial fashion (esp to poorer students). DOJ slammed, of all things, an anti-trust motion against them! Apparently, MIT was the only univ that didn't back down. They took it to court, and finally won. Sorta. The trends in fin aid still changed and merit-based financial aid systems started replacing need-based financial aid systems. Admissions, of course, have remained need-blind and merit-based. This change in financial aid means that less aid now goes to poorer, and often less qualified, students. Here's Vest's comment about this: "...All these factors have combined to cause a massive shift of financial support away from the poor- est students and families to those with somewhat higher incomes. Despite the very real pressures on middle-class families during the last dozen years [i.e. they might need the extra aid], I consider that the world of financial aid is less noble and fair than it once was." This also ties into the brouhaha going on in India over the IIMs' fees (and soon, I'm afraid, IITs' fees). To be fair, the median family income in India would be about Rs 50K, assuming families with atleast one regular job-holder. As such an IIT fee of about Rs 20-40K is fair considering that my estimated expenses at MIT are $52K (they pay :-) and the median American income is $53K. The IIMs' current fees are about 2 times the median income, but I think thats fair- people who go for MBAs often have savings or loans they can take. Hell! even IIT kids are getting richer. Most of them can now afford computers in their dorms. Even 5-6 years ago, there were lots who hadn't used computers until they came to IIT and could never imagine getting one for home use. The reason why more rich kids are getting into IITs is probably the same as in America- their rich parents can better help them prep. Of course, I neglected to mention that its pretty much impossible for any really poor kid (whose parents earn less than Rs20K/pa) in India to make it to the IITs/IIMs. His schooling just won't prepare him for the entrance exams. But that discussion will involve India's non-existent primary/secondary education set-up... [Mon, 12 Apr 2004]
Reminds me of an exchange that took place last week at HBS. Indian students at HBS had organized a day-long India Business Conference, complete with big names and all. During a panel discussion, somebody asked Montek Singh Ahluwalia if the civic structures in India are degrading and isn't this degradation disastrous for the Indian democracy. His reply was "well, that's not really true. Some institutional change is normal as a democracy matures. And many elements of the civic life have become stronger [- the election commission, the supreme court, and the various NGOs etc..]"
[Sat, 10 Apr 2004]
Surprise Surprise, Laloo doesn't like being taken pot-shots at. Houses of glass and stones and so on... And one would've thought that he'd stop explaining his middle name once he turned 70. For once TOI gets out of its usual tabloid-y mode to point out something of interest- our politicians get real good deals on real estate. If you count a Kennedy as a friend and you are in politics and you're American then you must be golden, right ? Umm...not exactly... This poor fellow says "com'on, lets stop fighting and lets play fair.". Pat comes the reply, "not until we beat you, buster." [Mon, 22 Mar 2004]
Anyways, on to the book. Ashoke and Ashima are first generation immigrants to U.S. After getting his PhD from MIT, Ashoke moves (family in tow, of course) to a Boston suburb, to a nameless college and an eventless career. Ashima, ever the dutiful wife, gets over her acute boredom and discomfort once kids arrive. Socially, their lives revolve around the Weekend Bengali Friends Network. The book is mostly about their son, Gogol and how he hates his name for much of the book, changing it to Nikhil at the first chance he get. The latter parts of the story are spun around episodes in Gogol/Nikhil's life-- his various ill-fated relationships and Ashoke's death. I like the book-- it is written beautifully. Jhumpa Lahiri has a way with words, unpretentious yet very beautiful. I hope to re-read the book again, more slowly. Here's a passage: "They were brown shoes with black heels and off-white laces and stitching. There was a band of lentil-sized holes embossed on either side of each shoe, and at the tips was a pretty pattern pricked into the leather as if with a needle. Looking more closely, she saw the shoemaker's name on the inside, in gold lettering that had all but faded....Ashima, unable to resist a sudden and overwhelming urge, stepped into the shoes at her feet. Lingering sweat from the owner's feet mingled with hers, causing her heart to race; it was the closest thing she had ever experienced to the touch of a man. " Just for comparison, see the following passage. It is from a review about this book!: "Spanning three decades and two continents, The Namesake's story line is episodic, nearly picaresque, a literary form whose expansiveness and fluidity assert a sense of individual autonomy and mobility. The story limns the unforgiving and often repressive claims of memory and family tradition in unresolved discord with the equally insistent immigrant claims of establishing a new and meaningful identity in the New World." I do have a couple of grouses about the book, though. The book pretends to care deeply about the Gogol/Nikhil dichotomy, especially in the initial parts; it tries to weave it in with his teenage angst, his relationships, and his eventual self-discovery. I can see the motivation for doing this but I wish she had found a better peg to hang the initial parts on. Parts of the plot are somewhat predictable but that doesn't take much away from the book. Another interesting thing about the book is how it rarely describes how Ashoke and Ashima feel. Their lives are described more by how Nikhil remembers them rather than by describing what goes on in their heads, though Lahiri *does* do the latter as well. I couldn't make up my mind as to whether Lahiri wanted me not to care much about Ashoke and Ashima or if she was portraying them as "reserved" people, the emotions hidden behind a facade of dull and mundane life. On the whole, a great book. Although, I do wish Jhumpa Lahiri would stop writing about self-discovery and related emotional issues among first and second generation Indian-Americans. She's too good to beat this dead horse. [Thu, 26 Feb 2004]
This bug had come from a Japanese sales guy who was in total panic over some big deal that depended on fixing this bug. Now, almost all of the file seemed to be in ASCII text-- it was mostly DNA sequence data only. But the file name wasn't! It was a Japanese file name, written in Unicode. Each unicode letter is 2 bytes. ASCII, with 128 chars, is only 1 byte and one bit is still left empty. The short story is that the program was confusing the higher order unicode byte for the null character and terminating the string-read. The right way would have been to fix all our code to use Unicode libraries so as to read these things even if they were written in Egyptian Hierloglyphs. In addition to this being damn tedious, we'd have lost the sale and it wouldn't be fun listening to a Jap swearing in English. I did what my boss recommended- skip reading the file-name from inside the file. The damn thing is already known.
The biggest problem with tortillas is heating them. Any self-respecting roti is warm, soft, and a bit fluffed up. With tortillas, however, getting both the "warm" and the "soft" part is tricky. Forget about the "fluffed-up" part. Microwaves, unfortunately, make hot papad out of tortilla. As it is, frozen tortilla already has some papad like tendencies. Even heating it on a tawa doesn't usually get rid of the frozen chip-like parts. The worst part is, a heated tortilla has to be eaten immediately. As it cools, it hardens. So the 2nd tortilla on your plate is already a papad by the time you get to it. Another option is to use more oil and make parathas out of tortillas, since hardened parathas are not as bad as hardened rotis. However, its just not the same thing. Today, I tried something. I let the frozen tortilla, from the fridge, sit in water for about 15 secs. The resulting thing seems like it is barely hanging on to itself and will decompose into dough any minute. I then transferred it to the hot tawa/pan. Here's the important part: You have to use tongs or something to flip the thing very frequently (every few seconds) otherwise the wet stuff sticks to the pan. But if you manage to do the flipping well and wait until some brown spots appear, you have a warm and soft tortilla (with a nice paratha-like sheen) that stays soft for quite a while. [Mon, 23 Feb 2004]
I was wrong about the movie reference. This is Poison Ivy, this is The Crush
[Tue, 17 Feb 2004]
On a related note, I hate this marketing practice of closely positioned "price-points". I always overspend :-(( On yet another related note, the basic MIT cable package doesn't have Food Network :-(( [Sat, 14 Feb 2004]
So the current plan is to orient the class around problem solving sessions, e.g, "is it better to push a box or pull it?" or "why do ice-skaters pull in their arms while spinning?" etc. Hopefully, I can sneak in some of the underlying principles when solving these problems. Its going to be hard to keep math usage to a minimum, though. Even though I am aiming at juniors/seniors, I have been asked to avoid differential calculus-- very few high-schoolers are expected to know it. Still, I plan to cover to vectors, S.I. units, 1D/2D motion, Newton's Laws, force-body diagrams, conservation of linear momentum, and hopefully some rotational dynamics (billiards shots!). Lets see what I get to. Any interesting physics problems I can steal from you ? [Wed, 04 Feb 2004]
[Sun, 01 Feb 2004]
Despite, or maybe because, how short this trip was I pigged out big time this time. Here's a sample of the dishes: gaajar ka halwa, keema, chicken, lamb, matar ki poori, normal poori, aloo ke paranthe, laal peda, nimona, chane aur lauki ki daal, poha, chhole bhature, shahi paneer, mirch ki sabzi, makke ki roti and many others. Missed out on mushroom matar, though. I also ended up visiting quite a few places and met quite a few people, both old and new. The first 2-3 days in Delhi were lots of fun. A wealthy MBA even treated me to lunch, coffee, and a movie. Barista has lowered their prices for coffee. It is now Rs35 for the regulation mocha/latte-- only about twice of what I would gladly pay for it. This also means, probably, that the coffee at not-that-hep chains like Cafe Coffee Day is now sensibly priced. In the last trip, I'd seen some school kids studying in a Barista. This time I saw eunuchs and a wannabe rock band. We're getting there, America. Only if the shopkeepers at South-Ex improved their English and somebody did a Jerry Springer-like desi show, we'll be all set. I even drove around Delhi, for three days, without my Indian driving license. Here's a thumb-rule for which side of road you should be driving on: the median of the road should be on the driver's side. Driving in Delhi wasn't too bad. Delhi-ites are slightly flexible in their interpretation of traffic rules but, still, its more than you can say for Banarasis. Driving in Banaras is essentially video-game driving, the only difference being that the max speed is 30kmph and you are not allowed to mow down humans. Good practice for GTA3: Vice City. Also attended a friend's wedding in Jaipur. It was lots of fun-- we even managed to get the bride and groom to perform Govinda-ishtyle thumkes on the stage. We had encircled them so Parents & Co. couldn't see what was happening. We then managed to get the groom, Amit, to come down to the main pavilion and dance to the tune of "main zoru ka gulaam ban ke rahoonga". But before we could entice our not-yet-bhabhiji to come down, Amit's mom shooed us all back to the stage. Damn! Compared to Boston, the weather was positively warm. But since floors are cold and indoor heating is absent, thick socks and infrequent baths are recommended. The roads are improving. Delhi-Jaipur road is quite good, though eastern UP is probably 5-10 years behind the rest of the country in getting decent roads. As a city, Banaras keeps baffling me. Nothing seems to change- the way people spend their time, the lack of any real industry (apart from silk sarees and carpets), the abysmal infrastructure, lots of horribly poor people, no real middle class, and a few outrageously rich people (not all of them honourably rich) and a predominantly feudal mindset. Ah well, things can only improve. In the end, the trip became really hectic. India trips shouldn't be much shorter than this. So many things happened that even my memories are a bit mixed up. Now I am back on my way, waiting at CDG for my connection to Boston. Strolling through the airport mall is an experience in itself. Amazement gives way to an inferiority complex ($250 for a Hugo Boss t-shirt) which soon gives way to irritation ($250 for a cotton t-shirt!). All I can see at CDG are Armani, Gucci, YSL, Hugo Boss, Chanel and what not. I just can't find a $1.50 chapstick. A mocha and muffin cost me about $10, obscene even by Starbucks standards. Sure, airport malls are costly but still... Ah well, there are enough beautiful people for all the beautiful shops in Paree. Just like enough people in Delhi will pay Rs 1000 for a dinner. Then again, maybe I really am a cheapskate. Funnily enough, American coffee shops advertise their French Roast and their Italian espresso. The cafe at CDG, in turn, sells the San Francisco Steamer Coffee. The love-hate relationship across the Atlantic will continue, it seems. [Wed, 31 Dec 2003]
Pretty much all the Indian Magazines (India Today) are talking about how the year was for India. Outlook does have a slightly different focus- they are talking about the zippies. Zippies are the post Gen Y generation- aged 15-25. I just missed the cutoff. Its official now, I am an outcast from all generations now. Its OK, I'm anyway sick and tired of all these surveys where each generation turns out, surprise surprise, to have a heart of gold and be totally driven. The best set of articles is in BusinessWorld. Built around a rehash of the Goldman Sachs study but they have a really nice article about how India's foreign policy (and the world's perception of India) is changing for the better. They make a good point of how the world won't de-hyphenize "India-Pakistan" unless we do it ourselves first. Do read their round-about way of stressing the "its the economy, stupid!" thing at the end of the cover story. [Fri, 26 Dec 2003]
Some of the prevalent sentiments just made my blood boil. Like the Canadian P.M.'s statement that "The Empire of Rome was composed of slave states; the British Empire is a galaxy of free nations". Or why millions died in the famines-- they were too poor to buy food: "the average daily income of the people of India in the year 1850 was estimated as four cents per person (a pittance on which one wonders that any human being can live), in 1882 it had fallen to three cents per person, and in 1900 actually to less than two cents per person". Or the claim that governing India was an expensive task: " Of course the reason why is plain: it is because it is a government carried on not by the people of the soil, but by men from a distant country. These foreigners, having all power in their own hands, including power to create such offices as they choose and to attach to them such salaries and pensions as they see fit, naturally do not err on the side of making the offices too few or the salaries and pensions too small. Nearly all the higher officials throughout India are British." Finally, there was a good rejoinder to the disgusting statement that Indians can't rule themselves: "It is said that India is incapable of ruling herself. If so, what an indictment is this against England! She was not incapable of ruling herself before England came. Have one hundred and fifty years of English tutelage produced in her such deterioration? As we have seen, she was possessed of a high civilization and of developed governments long before England or any part of Europe had emerged from barbarism." There was this funny (in retrospect) remark that avg Indian income was $6.00 annually and he paid $2.00 in taxes and how no American would tolerate paying 1/3rd his income in taxes. Heck! They pay a lot more these days!! Kudos to the Soviet Union; if only for having made the rest of the world a little more welfare-oriented.
"If you let it, this is bound to turn into a silly day, dear Libra. Your best tactic would be to simply give in to the strange patterns at work in the universe. Communication seems to get blocked at every turn. You can expect to have technical difficulties, such as a phone malfunction or a computer shutdown. You and your mate will speak as though in two different languages. No one seems able to get his or her point across. Don't fight it. Just laugh along with everyone else. Tomorrow, all will be normal once again." Did the guy have too much eggnogg or what! [Mon, 15 Dec 2003]
"Hasla la vista"!!! Arrrgh....
CNN is definitely the worst offender. Once I caught this headline in their ticker-tape: "The Reproducers: Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker have a baby [boy/girl/whatever]". Of course, the pun was on the hit Broadway show "The Producers" in which Broderick had a starring role. |