Analyzing Discrepancies in History Books
"Retribution and Mercy" is a very good book on one of the bloodiest
times in the Tinoori/human wars, though a bit biased against the
Tinoori.
"Tactical Imperative", which I read in both Intergal and the original
Tinooranthi, dates to the same period, and is strangely dry and
digressatory; it isn't an academic history book so much as an
interesting artifact, but it does have a lot of data on the time period.
Discrepancies:
-  "Retribution and Mercy" discusses the bloodthirstiness of the
   Tinoori as a major motivating feature for their assault on the
   civilian human settlement of Serpent's Reach.  In "Tactical
   Imperative", on the other hand, it points out the necessity of
   stealth-- had a single sentry been able to sound the alarm, the
   subsequent attack on a larger military base would have been
   thwarted.  The latter is likely to be correct-- as the archived
   blogs of that period indicate, most of the settlement was not
   harmed, because they were sleeping and were not in a location to
   send the alarm.  It was the sentries and those who were awake in
   the dead of night who were cut down quickly and quietly.  Although
   many civilians were killed, rather than just soldiers, there would
   have been far more casualties were bloodthirstiness or vengeance
   the primary motivation for the attack.  The Tinoori, as The Other,
   were demonized for their different worldview.  By viewing them as
   savage, it is easier to justify more brutal tactics against them.
   This was the result of long-term propaganda campaigns on Cabry.
-  Both books describe the effects of a breakout of a virulent
   influenza equivalent in the Tinoori capital on the war effort.
   "Retribution and Mercy" states that this was a natural outbreak,
   whereas "Tactical Imperative" states that it was a human bioagent
   that caused the plague.  Given the dispersal pattern of the
   outbreak, and the fact that it seems not to have been a weaponized
   biological agent, it seems more likely that the translation of
   "Tactical Imperative" is imperfect, and what is listed as a high
   probability, in Tinooranthi, was translated into fact in Intergal.
-  Both books claim that military success was the primary motivator
   for the period of calm that occurred during 2610.155 to 2611.030--
   with "Tactical Imperative" describing Tinoori victories that caused
   human retreat, and "Retribution and Mercy" describing how the Blue
   forces, having demostrated their military strength and resolve and
   secured their main settlements, that the Tinoori were disheartened.
   Neither mentions the selection of the new planetary governor by the
   Hegemon, after the previous governor was removed for what the New
   Light cabinet, in hearings on the war, called his "excesses".  The
   new governor, although hardly a peace activist, said in his memoirs
   that he wanted to begin his time by putting out political fires in
   the capital before beginning another offensive.
-  "Retribution and Mercy" and "Tactical Imperative" differ on the
   date for the infamous Battle of Willow Falls, by with the latter
   twenty ticks after the former.  Military records indicate a spike
   in the number of fatalities around the date indicated in "Tactical
   Imperative", whereas there was no corresponding spike around the
   date offered by "Retribution and Mercy".  I posit that the latter
   date was taken from the deployment of armor units, which did occur
   at the earlier date.
-  Both books agree that the Tinoori leadership went into disarray
   after 2613.201, but they disagree as to the cause.  "Retribution
   and Mercy" claims that it was part of a precision strike aimed at
   the wartime headquarters of the Tinoori.  "Tactical Imperative"
   says that it was most probable that a schism erupted between the
   TGC and PGC which resulted in violence, including high-ranking
   fatalities.  There is no independent confirmation of the latter,
   however, whereas there are two reports from human military records
   that indicate the former is more plausible.  First is the transfer
   request for a master thief, Antoine Marquez, from New Light to
   Cabry, who was being held under maximum surveillance and security.
   The second is a reconnaisance report received on tight laser from
   deep behind enemy lines that indicate coordinates of a "hi lvl ldr
   mtg" and a subsequent statement of "strk now".  Prison logs from
   that time indicate that Marquez arrived on Cabry as scheduled on
   2613.185, and then escaped on 2613.198.  Despite the nature of this
   prisoner, the case was marked closed by the military intelligence
   commander on site at the time, on 2613.202, without a thorough
   investigation.  It seems likely that Marquez was recruited for a
   recon op, as one of the few people likely to be able to penetrate
   far enough into Tinoori territory to get accurate coordinates for a
   decapitation strike.  Given the Tinoori view of humans as
   non-sentient, and their reliance on their superior powers of
   perception, it is easy to believe that they would not consider the
   possibility that a human had actually infiltrated to the center of
   their command structure.
-  "Retribution and Mercy" claims that morale among human citizens
   during the various assaults remained high, despite setbacks,
   because of the righteousness of their cause and the belief that
   without their efforts, the human settlements would be overrun.
   "Tactical Imperative" claimed that humans, both civilians and
   soldiers, fled before Tinoori onslaughts, and that their fear made
   Tinoori victory that much easier.  The latter is more likely to be
   correct, given the necessity of conscription that occurred during
   the worst periods of combat, and the fact that the desertion rate
   was significantly higher among the ground soldiers than among naval
   officers who were fighting the Red fleet.
[Out of Game]
4 successes in History.
Back to Jim's page!