February 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28          

Authors' Committee

Chair:

Matt Blackwell (Gov)

Members:

Martin Andersen (HealthPol)
Kevin Bartz (Stats)
Deirdre Bloome (Social Policy)
John Graves (HealthPol)
Rich Nielsen (Gov)
Maya Sen (Gov)
Gary King (Gov)

Weekly Research Workshop Sponsors

Alberto Abadie, Lee Fleming, Adam Glynn, Guido Imbens, Gary King, Arthur Spirling, Jamie Robins, Don Rubin, Chris Winship

Weekly Workshop Schedule

Recent Comments

Recent Entries

Categories

Blogroll

SMR Blog
Brad DeLong
Cognitive Daily
Complexity & Social Networks
Developing Intelligence
EconLog
The Education Wonks
Empirical Legal Studies
Free Exchange
Freakonomics
Health Care Economist
Junk Charts
Language Log
Law & Econ Prof Blog
Machine Learning (Theory)
Marginal Revolution
Mixing Memory
Mystery Pollster
New Economist
Political Arithmetik
Political Science Methods
Pure Pedantry
Science & Law Blog
Simon Jackman
Social Science++
Statistical modeling, causal inference, and social science

Archives

Notification

Powered by
Movable Type 4.24-en


« January 2011 | Main | March 2011 »

9 February 2011

Tingley on "A Statistical Method for Empirical Testing of Competing Theories"

Just a note about the Applied Statistics Workshop today, February 9th, where we are excited to have Dustin Tingley from the Department of Government here at Harvard presenting joint work with Kosuke Imai entitled “A Statistical Method for Empirical Testing of Competing Theories”. As usual, the workshop will begin with a light lunch at 12 noon, followed by the presentation at 12:15.

Abstract:

Empirical testing of competing theories lies at the heart of social science research. We demonstrate that a very general and well-known class of statistical models, called finite mixture models, provides an effective way of rival theory testing. In the proposed framework, each observation is assumed to be generated from a statistical model implied by one of the theories under consideration. Researchers can then estimate the probability that a specific observation is consistent with either of the competing theories. By directly modeling this probability with the characteristics of observations, one can also determine the conditions under which a particular theory applies. We discuss a principled way to identify a list of observations that are statistically significantly consistent with each theory. Finally, we propose several measures of the overall performance of a particular theory. We illustrate the advantages of our method by applying it to an influential study on trade policy preferences.

Posted by Matt Blackwell at 7:53 AM

4 February 2011

Mapping the Republican Field for 2012

I really enjoyed these two graphics (link 1, link 2).

Posted by Richard Nielsen at 3:18 PM

Crayola Colors in R

Kottke observes that the whole list of Crayola colors and their hex codes is on Wikipedia, which got me thinking that it might be useful to have some colors to spruce up R graphics. So, I went ahead and created a convenient crayola vector to access all 133 standard Crayola colors. Here are all the colors in R:

crayola-R.png

And here is a simple example of how to use it:

hist(rnorm(1000), col = crayola["Granny Smith Apple"], border = "white", yaxt = "n")

granny-hist.png

Always remember, folks, playing with colors is a dangerous game. Use discretion.

Posted by Matt Blackwell at 10:38 AM