Intravoxel Dephasing due to Wave Gradients
This article assumes prior knowledge of Wave-CAIPI[1]. In particular, this article attempts to describe the methodology used to generate Figure 9 of [1]. For simplicity, assume a two-dimensional problem. \(x\) and \(y\) will denote the readout and phase encode directions, and \(k_x\) and \(k_y\) will denote the respective k-space directions. Let \(m\) be the underlying image and \(w\) be the Wave-PSF as described in Wave-CAIPI[1].
Consider the voxel corresponding to the center of the image (at \(x = 0\) mm and \(y = 0\) mm). The sinusoid gradients induce a spreading along the readout direction as a function of \(y\). This can be modelled as convolution as follows:
Here, \(v\) denotes the acquired data in the \((x, y)\) domain. The subscript in \((\ast_x)\) implies this convolution is applied only along the \(x\) direction.
In reality, the underlying image \(m\) exists as a continuum and the wave gradients induce a spreading within the voxel itself. Assuming the image resolution is at 1 mm isotropic resolution, the voxel at \((0, 0)\) is in effect the sum of all the contributions within the continuum \([-0.5, 0.5] \text{mm} \times [-0.5, 0.5] \text{mm}\). This summing effect can be modelled as,
Expanding the above,
Now comes the main assumption:
With this in place, the previous equation decouples to the following:
Let \(W(x, y)\) be defined as,
With using \(W\), the equation looks once again like the original convolution model.
Looking at the PSF \(W(x, y)\) at the center voxel (as in Figure 9 of [1]) which models the intravoxel dephasing within a voxel, we see that wave gradients induce a small side lobe.
References.
- Bilgic B, Gagoski BA, Cauley SF, et al. Wave-CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(6):2152-2162. doi:10.1002/mrm.25347