|
AGU Fall 2009 | Poster T31A-1783 | 16 December | 8:00-12:20 Poster Hall,
Moscone South
Constraints on early Gulf of California rifting from seismic images across the eastern margin of Guaymas Basin
Nathaniel C. Miller,
Daniel Lizarralde,
Alistair Harding,
Graham Kent
Abstract
Multi-channel seismic (MCS) images and seismic velocity models from three transects crossing the eastern
margin of Guaymas Basin provide new insights into early rifting and the transition from rifting to
spreading in the Gulf of California. Two distinct kinematic models have been proposed for early
rifting (~13-6 Ma) in the Gulf, one in which Pacific/North America relative motion is partitioned between
right-lateral dextral shear west of the Baja Peninsula and east-west extension in the proto-Gulf prior to
lithospheric rupture and the onset of spreading, and a second model in which "oblique" extension oriented
in the direction of Pacific/North America relative motion (NW-SE) has persisted since the onset of rifting
at ~13 Ma. The three MCS transects all reveal a smooth, bright, undulating reflector that we interpret
as the top of a ~2-km-thick, diapiric salt body overlying igneous basement. This body underlies 0.5 to 2 km
of sediment with deformation indicative of diapiric motion of the salt body. Seismic tomography images the
interpreted salt body as a shallow, high-velocity (~4.0-4.5 km/s) region above igneous basement and just
inboard of the continent ocean transition, consistent with an interpretation of a thick salt unit formed
within an early rift basin on extended continental crust. The western (seaward) edge of the interpreted salt
body is oriented north-south, suggesting that this early rift basin also trended north-south. This observation
favors a kinematic model in which some portion of Pacific/North America relative motion is partitioned onto
east/west dipping normal faults within the proto-Gulf prior to ~6 Ma. Comparison of crustal-scale tomograms
along these same transects provides additional insight into structural orientations and magmatic emplacement
at the time of lithospheric rupture.
Poster
PDF (5.4 Mb)
| |