I do not intend to say much about the church's doctrine--- I believe that the fundamentals of their faith are truly Christian, even if some details are suspect. I suppose it's a question of zeal and motive as to whether you want to declare specific doctrines heretical. I do not agree with the assessment of Mr. Moran, who strikes me as forcing his own interpretations onto Witness Lee's teachings to prove his point. I certainly would never have agreed with many the doctrines he criticizes the church for holding, in public or private. On the other hand, Witness Lee always made it easy to misinterpret his teachings, by applying analogies much too freely. As regards my experience, it is the practical aspects of ``the church's'' teachings that are important. I shall try to list them, and spare the reader my commentary until the end:

I must emphasize strongly that very little is actually enforced, except to the extent that peer pressure affects how people behave. There are many people who do not follow all of the above precepts--- college students with girlfriends, high schoolers with baggy pants and posters of Tupac in their rooms, older members who have been quiet in meetings for years. The more ``living'' members just encourage them to ``function'' more actively. The effect of this encouragement is variable, and some members can push quite hard in their zeal, especially if they get to give a message during a conference or a retreat. It doesn't always work, and many members are good at ignoring it--- especially ``church kids'' who have listened to it all their lives.

Yet the affect of the atmosphere is profound, and it says a lot about human nature. One is put into a peculiar position because the practices of ``the church'' are contrary to those of society, as their spiritual doctrine demands. This leads to conflict with friends and family who do not understand the reasons for their loved ones' behavior, which can ultimately hurt relationships. This in turn has led to accusations that ``the church'' is cultic. These are not entirely unfounded, but one must be aware that ``cult'' should not be taken in a Heaven's Gate or Branch Dividian sense of the word. Yet the pressure to conform and live up to expectations can be subtle and powerful, and the level of zeal and excitement is not conducive to clear thinking. I feel that ``the Local Churches'' should be approached with discretion.

Now that I think of it, this list is bizarre--- I actually took all this for granted as a normal way of life . . .


Feel free to mail comments to: muno@mit.edu