Title: The Good Fairies of New York Author: Martin Millar Year: 1992 Publisher: Trafalgar Square Publishing Reviewer: Alan Smithee (pseudonym to protect the guilty) Anyone who has met me and been forced to put up with me for more than five minutes has probably heard my Rules for Bad Books (TM). Specifically, a set of 3 simple criteria that can be used when purchasing a book to determine whether or not it's likely to be total crap. For the uninitiated, I have summarized them below: 1) The book contains the words 'A Novel' somewhere on the cover without any context. If the publisher needs to TELL you that this collection of printed dead tree is, in fact, a novel, then you've got problems. 2) If the author's name is printed in a larger font size than the title. (Author's name and title being in the same font size doesn't count.) This means the book is being sold solely based on who wrote it, and not because it's good. 3) The back cover or inside flap, normally being reserved for a brief teaser plot synopsis, are covered instead with 'praise' for the book. If they need to spend all their time telling you it's good, while not providing you with a blurb to help you decide for yourself, then there could be problems. Now, to qualify as bad, a book must meet at least two of the three criteria listed above. Meeting only one should raise suspicions, but that doesn't mean it will be bad. It just means that the publishers flunked cover design school, which anyone who has seen either the Hitlercycle or the cover of Der Kadett can readily agree is a common occurrence. Lets see... The Good Fairies of New York. Author's name bigger than title? Check. Back cover filled with praise instead of plot? Check. Fuuuuck. Now, like any good science-minded person, I always make allowances for the fact that my theory could be proven wrong. With every new book I read, I could stumble across that hidden gem which shakes the very foundations of my carefully honed thesis. Could The Good Fairies of New York very well be that book? Uhm, no. The best I can figure, it's about crackheaded, kilt-wearing, fiddle-playing fairies from Scotland that get lost in New York for some reason. Only certain people can see them, possibly while high. I'm not 100% sure. I can't read more than a few pages at a time without putting it down and resting my eyes because the writing is simply THAT disjointed. It wouldn't surprise me if this book is one of those things that only makes sense after taking copious amounts of drugs, and since I don't take drugs, more research is needed to confirm this. Quote: "'I've decided not to believe in you in the hopes that you will disappear.'" Unfortunately, no amount of willing or wishing can make this book go away. But as much as I want to sink my filthy claws into it and just rip it to shreds, I can't. I have to be fair here. As objectively horrible as this book is in every way, I can't help but imagine what a competent storyteller would have done with the concept. I mean, the main idea of the story in of itself isn't so bad? Actually, well, yes, it is. Crackheaded fairies never ends well. But it had potential. It really had the chance to be one of those endearingly bad books that you somehow love anyway in spite of it being so mindfuckingly stupid. Instead, we get crack. The bad kind of crack cut with drano or something that makes you go blind and all your teeth fall out. Maybe if I could force myself to read it all the way through without stopping for periodic psych evaluations I would be able to pick out some sort of real storyline, but I can't, even though the back cover swears to me that one should be there. Maybe there was one, but all the whiskey killed it off. In Conclusion: Theory confirmed. Expect a summarization of my research to appear in leading scientific journals within the next 6 months. I will use my commission to bribe certain key publishers into publishing less crap. Hey, if they can make more money by NOT clogging the shelves with these books, then they just might take me up on the offer. Also, apparently fairy vomit smells good. Who knew?