Title: Blood and Iron Author: Elizabeth Bear Year: 2006 Publisher: Roc Reviewer: Jake Beal This book took me so long to read and review that, unbeknownst to me, Kevin finished his own review before I even realized that he was writing one too. And while I must say that Ms. Bear does write well, judging by Kevin's experience, it seems that a long slow progress through "Blood and Iron" is not unusual. That said, go read his review now; I'll wait for you right here. Back? OK, you're ahead of me. I'm not reading his review until I've written my own, and we'll see how closely our opinions relate to one another. So, let's start with the basics: Ms. Bear's "Blood and Iron" begins what is clearly to be an epic saga of the clash between mortal mages and predatory fae, with Hell sticking its oar in just for good measure. This clash is brought to a head by the appearance of a Merlin (an extremely magical human) and a Dragon Prince, who always brings blood and change and is fated to be betrayed by his loved ones. But, of course, this is Ms. Bear we're speaking of, and the obvious plotlines turn subtle and start corkscrewing around on us. Nobody's the Good Guys, nobody's acting from particularly clean or heroic motives, and nobody's as harnessed to their fate as they think that they are. It takes a damned long time for the book to get there, though. For the longest time, I thought I was going to be watching a fairly standard Shakespearean tragedy, and felt like all the interesting convoluted mythos was just so much Gaiman retread. Even once we get there, I'm not quite sure that it's worth it: I found the morality play that is going on pretty painful and straightforward ("Who are the real monsters here?"), and all very much a victim of the "Great Man" theory of history. Which, in fairness, is how this particular universe is defined to work, and Ms. Bear is certainly capable of writing books that don't suffer from it. So perhaps it's just not to my taste. In the end, I would recommend this book to those with a higher appreciation for Shakespearean tragedy and high epic than myself. It's clearly a good novel, well done, capable of taking highly unexpected turns and a sophisticated approach to its material. And I'll probably read the next in the series to see if that catches me more than this one did. I'm just sad that it wasn't as marvelous an experience as I had hoped.