Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 17:18:46 -0900 From: Chris Lott Subject: Re: INT: EmJays:Re: emjays or whatever On Sun, 17 Nov 1996, Bill Lantry wrote: > At 10:54 AM 11/17/96 -0500, you wrote: > >Chris Lott writes: > >>[...] > >> > >>Is everyone missing the simple fact that Scott and Zak are not-so-subtly > >>campaigning for list curmudgeon?? :) > > Yes, Chris, based on the private mail I've been > getting, it seems I have much competition this year, but I think there's > some misunderstanding of the catagory. Some have written me asking > why I desire to remain list curmudgeon. The only thing I can imagine > is that they seem to be confusing 'List Curmudgeon' > with 'List A**h***' > > There is a big difference. When I finally beat out Bill Sier for > the honored crown, I took on the reponsability for being > the grump of the list, not the one who's always making > pointless, disagreeable trouble. There's a great difference > between saying the equivalent of "Bah Humbug" and saying the > equivalent of "F*** O**" At the point I sent that message-- at THIS point actually-- I hadn't/haven't seen anything near n F*** OFF message from Zak or Scott. But then I have been deleting most of the EMJAY threads unread. As far as I could tell Zak was doing a pretty good rendition of curmudgeon. c -- Chris Lott fncll@aurora.alaska.edu