MadSci Network: Earth Sciences
Date: Sat Oct 14 14:49:21 2000
Posted By: Jason Goodman, Graduate Student, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Area of science: Earth Sciences
ID: 971181807.Es
Message:
Your question is a good one, but there are several incorrect assumptions
inherent in it.
- The Earth's core is not constantly cooling. The famous
physicist Lord Kelvin fell into this trap when he assumed that the heat in
the Earth's interior was the remnant of the formation of the planet, and
thus concluded
that the Earth was no more than 20 million years old. We now know this
number is too small by a factor of 300. He went wrong because he didn't
know about the heat constantly generated by radioactive elements in the
core, which maintains the core temperature over billions of years. So
you're in very good company in making this error.
- The mantle does not act as a traditional insulator, in which
the insulation strength (R-value) is proportional to its thickness. This
is because the mantle is constantly convecting (i.e., flowing in an
overturning motion as hot rock rises and cold rock sinks), and the movement
of this rock carries heat efficiently from the core to the crust. You
should think of the mantle as being like a pot of molasses on a stove,
rather than a sheet of styrofoam.
-
In any case, the thickness of the mantle is not significantly different
under the continents versus the oceans. What does differ is the
thickness of the crust. Unlike the mantle, the crust does not
flow, so it does act like a traditional insulator.
-
Thus, there are significant differences in the amount of heat
flowing out through the surface of the Earth, but they're due to
differences in the thickness of the crust, not the mantle. However, this
heat amounts to no more than one or two hundred milliwatts per square
meter. This is a
miniscule fraction of the heat provided by the sun, which averages several
hundred watts per square meter.
Thus, geothermal heating is "a spit in the ocean" compared to the solar
heating, and does not have any significant effects on Earth's climate. The
effect is at least a factor of 20 smaller than the effect of human-produced
greenhouse gases, and even that effect is very hard to detect.
On the other hand, it is possible that geothermal heat could have a
significant impact on the circulation of the cold darkness of the deepest
parts of the ocean. Here, the influence of the Sun is much, much weaker.
Two scientists here at MIT (Jeff Scott and Alistair Adcroft) are looking
into this. I'm not sure if they've published their work yet.
Current Queue |
Current Queue for Earth Sciences |
Earth Sciences archives
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Earth Sciences.
MadSci Network,
webadmin@www.madsci.org
© 1995-2000. All rights reserved.