About that study ...
The home site for the
study
This is the WWW site for the source materials.
Critiques
- The Hoffman & Novak critique (extensive)
-
"A Detailed Analysis of the Conceptual, Logical, and Methodological
Flaws in the article "Marketing Pornography on the Information
Superhighway"
See also their web site
- Critique by
David Post,
Prof. of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
-
A Preliminary Discussion of
Methodological Peculiarities in the Rimm Study
of Pornography on the "Information Superhighway"
- Jacking in from the "Point-Five Percent Solution" Port
-
Brock Meeks CyberWire Dispatch about the whole case.
Public postings by the principle investigator, Martin Rimm
- Early comments
-
A public posting during the initial stages
- Later comments
-
Comments after the CMU censorship case raged
Go back to the
writings
section, or return to the homepage for the
MIT
Student Association for Freedom of Expression
Mail comments to safe-request@mit.edu
This page written by
Seth
Finkelstein,
sethf@mit.edu
Disclaimer: This page is a statement of opinion, and does not represent
the viewpoint of the MIT Student Association for Freedom of Expression
or the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MIT bears no responsibility
for its contents or documents.