ODSA knew of planned explicit movie screening _By Joe Kilian _ The Office of the Dean for Student Affairs knew months in advance about an Independent Activities Period project that culminated in the presentation of a sexually explicit film, according to Ruth Perry, director of the Women's Studies Program. The Dean's Office did not, however, require the group to show the film to the _Ad Hoc_ Pornography Screening Committee. The Women's Studies Office sponsored a screening of _Not a Love Story_, a sexually explicit film about pornography, as part of a Jan. 29 Independent Activities Period activity, "Pornography in Film and Advertising: _Killing Us Softly _and _Not a Love Story_." The MIT policy statement on sexually explicit films declares that "no x-rated or unrated sexually explicit film should be shown without prior review by [the screening committee.]" Dean for Student Affairs Shirley M. McBay could not be reached for comment. Perry said that the Dean's Office "has known about this IAP project for months -- a study group culminating in the showing and discussing of this film and _Killing Us Softly_." Perry said, "the Dean's Office showed this film two years ago ... if that doesn't constitute approval, I don't know what does." The Lecture Series Committee (LSC) showed _The Opening of Misty Beethoven_, a sexually explicit film, on Registration Day in the fall of 1981. McBay forbade another screening planned first for Dec. 14, 1984, and then for last Friday, on the grounds that the screening committee had not reviewed the film. Perry responded to a protest letter from Gordon E. Strong '85, an LSC representative on the Screening Committee. Strong had written to screening committee Chairman John Hildebidle to protest the showing of _Not a Love Story_. Strong stated that the activity's sponsors did not notify the committee of their intent to show the film six weeks before the screening, as required by the MIT policy. The timing of Strong's protest of the showing of _Not a Love Story_ "makes it seem like retaliatory harassment directed at the young women who are already upset and threatened by the showing of pornography films on campus," Perry wrote. She also stated that _Not a Love Story_ is unrated, contrary to Strong's statement that it was x-rated. LSC Chairman Rim Cothren G disagreed. "Whether the film is x-rated or unrated is beside the point in this case. ... It is an explicit film." The screening committee will not take any direct action on Strong's letter, Hildebidle said. The protest "should have been addressed to" McBay, he said. The Dean's Office is "overseeing the whole process in which we are just one part," he continued. "We are, in fact, an advisory committee to the dean." Hildebidle would not speculate whether _Not a Love Story_ should have been presented to his committee for review. "It's hard for me to make a judgment because I haven't seen the movie," he said. Perry and Cothren disagreed on the interpretation of the phrase "sexually explicit." She noted that the first paragraph in the guidelines contains the phrase "sexually explicit or pornographic." Perry stated that the condition of being pornographic is included "parenthetically" wherever the term "sexually explicit" is used. "_Not a Love Story_ is not pornographic. It is about pornography," Perry said. Cothren said, "I think as long as you start reading things into the policy that [are] not explicitly stated, you run into trouble. We ran into that last year." Hildebidle said LSC has been the only group to contact him about screening films. He attributed it to the large number of movies LSC shows compared to other groups. "I don't think the procedures are inherently aimed at LSC," he said. LSC has no immediate action planned concerning the incident. "We are kind of waiting to see if the Dean's Office will do anything," Cothren said. ---- Copyright 1985 by The Tech. All rights reserved. This story was published on Tuesday, February 5, 1985. Volume 105, Number 1 The story began on page 1 and jumped to page 2. This article may be freely distributed electronically, provided it is distributed in its entirety and includes this notice, but may not be reprinted without the express written permission of The Tech. Write to archive@the-tech.mit.edu for additional details.