# Social Science Statistics Blog

July 2012
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28
29 | 30 | 31 |  |  |  |

### Authors' Committee

#### Chair:

Matt Blackwell (Gov)

#### Members:

Martin Andersen (HealthPol)
Kevin Bartz (Stats)
Deirdre Bloome (Social Policy)
John Graves (HealthPol)
Rich Nielsen (Gov)
Maya Sen (Gov)
Gary King (Gov)

### Weekly Research Workshop Sponsors

Alberto Abadie, Lee Fleming, Adam Glynn, Guido Imbens, Gary King, Arthur Spirling, Jamie Robins, Don Rubin, Chris Winship

Weekly Workshop Schedule

Search this site:

### Recent Comments

- Re: App Stats: Miratrix on "Random Weight Estimators: Adjusting Randomized Trials Without Using Observed Outcomes"
  By: azaz
- Re: App Stats: Miratrix on "Random Weight Estimators: Adjusting Randomized Trials Without Using Observed Outcomes"
  By: azaz
- Re: App Stats: Scanlan on "The Mismeasure of Group Differences in the Law and the Social and Medical Sciences"
  By: sakib
- Re: App Stats: Teixeira on "Viral Video Advertising"
  By: huijj002
- Re: App Stats: Teixeira on "Viral Video Advertising"
  By: Bery C.P
- Re: App Stats: Teixeira on "Viral Video Advertising"
  By: www.announceamerica.com
- Re: App Stats: Miratrix on "Random Weight Estimators: Adjusting Randomized Trials Without Using Observed Outcomes"
  By: zetar
- Re: App Stats: Miratrix on "Random Weight Estimators: Adjusting Randomized Trials Without Using Observed Outcomes"
  By: gutscheinezumausdrucken
- Re: App Stats: Miratrix on "Random Weight Estimators: Adjusting Randomized Trials Without Using Observed Outcomes"
  By: goga7777
- Re: App Stats: Grubb on "Cellular Service Demand: Biased Beliefs, Learning, and Bill Shock"
  By: luka

### Recent Entries

- Kaggle is going to take your job

### Categories

- Regular Post

### Blogroll

SMR Blog
Brad DeLong
Cognitive Daily
Complexity & Social Networks
Developing Intelligence
EconLog
The Education Wonks
Empirical Legal Studies
Free Exchange
Freakonomics
Health Care Economist
Junk Charts
Language Log
Law & Econ Prof Blog
Machine Learning (Theory)
Marginal Revolution
Mixing Memory
Mystery Pollster
New Economist
Political Arithmetik
Political Science Methods
Pure Pedantry
Science & Law Blog
Simon Jackman
Social Science++
Statistical modeling, causal inference, and social science

### Archives

- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005

### Notification

Enter e-mail to [un]subscribe:
Powered by
Movable Type 4.24-en
Syndicate this site (XML)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

« June 2012 | Main | September 2012 »

2 July 2012

### Kaggle is going to take your job

Ok, maybe not, but I was just introduced to kaggle, which is sort of like oDesk and a lot like topcoder: people post a problem and other people compete to win a prize by solving it most effectively. Kaggle is devoted to data analysis problems. For example, there is currently a contest to win 3 million if you can "Identify patients who will be admitted to a hospital within the next year, using historical claims data." Another contest is to "Identify people who have a high degree of Psychopathy based on Twitter usage," for $1000. Even at those low stakes, there 113 teams competing.

If it's like topcoder, it will be a remarkably cheap way to get great solutions to data problems. I'm not sure why (I guess competing analysts overestimate the probability of winning?), but this is what Karim Lakhani tells me. I'm already working on a paper using topcoder, but I'm now wondering -- half seriously -- if I could outsource my data analysis as well. I probably couldn't, but only because I enjoy this kind of work myself and I'd miss it.

If you work with data, will Kaggle eventually take your job? Well, it makes it easier for people with data to find the best analysts out there. I'm not directly in competition with these folks, since none of these companies would come to me with their consulting gigs anyway. But it does suggest that the consulting market for quantitative social scientists is on the verge of being restructured. I'm excited about that -- I'm willing to bet that we'll learn more this way.

Posted by Richard Nielsen at 8:55 PM